Introduction:
Cultural genocide, defined as the deliberate destruction of a group's cultural identity, is not currently recognized as a distinct crime under international law. This gap makes it difficult to prosecute states and institutions that systematically engage in cultural oppression. The aim of this proposal is to clearly define the concept of cultural genocide and integrate it into existing international law norms.
1. Definition of terms
Cultural genocide refers to systematic measures aimed at deliberately destroying the cultural identity of a national, ethnic, religious, or linguistic group. These measures include, but are not limited to:
- Prohibition or restriction of the mother tongue and cultural traditions
- Forced assimilation or re-education
- Destruction of cultural heritage sites, religious sites, or historical documents
- Deprivation of cultural forms of expression such as music, literature, or art
- Systematic restriction of cultural and religious practices by state organs
2. Legal basis and integration into existing law
In order to prosecute cultural genocide, it should be included as a separate offense in the following international legal norms:
- UN Genocide Convention (1948, Art. II): Addition of a clause covering not only physical destruction but also cultural destruction.
- Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC, 1998): Inclusion of cultural genocide as a crime against humanity (Art. 7) and as a separate offense alongside genocide (Art. 6).
- Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property (1954): Stronger sanctions for the deliberate destruction of cultural heritage as a means of cultural eradication.
3. Criteria for prosecution
For a case to be recognized as cultural genocide, the following criteria must be met:
- Systematic intent: Proof that the actions are part of a deliberate policy or strategy.
- Severity of the intervention: Evidence that the measures are aimed at the destruction or permanent suppression of a culture.
- Impact on a protected group: Application to national, ethnic, religious, or linguistic groups in accordance with the UN Genocide Convention.
- State or institutional involvement: Involvement or acquiescence by official bodies.
4. Application to current cases (e.g., China and the Uyghurs)
Chinese policy toward the Uyghurs includes numerous elements of cultural genocide, including the banning of the Uyghur language in schools, the destruction of religious sites, and coercive re-education measures. The proposed legal expansion would allow such acts to be prosecuted as a separate offense.
5. Conclusion and need for action
The recognition of cultural genocide as a criminal offense would close a crucial gap in international law. The international community should advocate for the adoption of corresponding legal extensions and the initiation of concrete criminal proceedings against states and institutions that use cultural destruction as a means of oppression.
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
